Brolli is a 1-year renewable patent license delivered as a soulbound NFT. It's meant to be a simple, checkable proof that a specific wallet address holds the license. Constraints: - One per wallet - Team purchases require one wallet per seat - Total supply capped at 50 - Price is $99 during the promotion

A soulbound license NFT minted to your wallet, plus a provenance reference (IPFS) that points to the patent + terms bundle, and an on-chain expiry timestamp.

Yes—one per wallet. Practical workflow: collect wallet addresses and buy one license per address.

No. It's soulbound (non-transferable) by design.

The wallet holding the NFT, the on-chain expiry timestamp, and the provenance reference in the NFT metadata. It's designed to be quick to verify.

Holiday Hacker Special: $99 (through January 9, 2026) Regular Price: $199 (starting January 10, 2026) This is a limited-time 50% discount for early adopters. Only 50 licenses total will be issued. Each license is valid for one year and renewable.

A BUIDLer is someone who actively builds real products and infrastructure in the blockchain ecosystem (not just speculation). It's a play on the HODL meme: "BUIDL" means build. In practice: devs, founders, and engineers who ship code, deploy protocols, and solve real-world problems—often in fintech, DeFi, RWA, and infrastructure. BUIDLers care about functionality, compliance, scalability, and long-term utility.

Buy for the wallet identity you want covered as proof (usually the company’s operational wallet). If multiple people/agents need coverage, issue one per wallet.

The license is time-limited and renewable. On-chain it's represented as an expiry timestamp for the covered wallet. Renewals extend from the later of "now" or "current expiry."

Included: the specific license grant described in the provenance/terms. Not included: specific IP protection, litigation outcomes, or guarantees you won’t be sued.

Agents can scale behavior fast; they also scale exposure fast. Brolli is positioned as a simple risk-reduction move for a specific category of IP tail risk while you iterate in regulated markets.

No. This product is an IP license. You still need your own compliance program and controls for your regulated activity.

"Dirty IP" is the practical risk that broad patent claims and asymmetric enforcement can create for startups. The existential problem usually isn't whether you're morally right; it's that litigation cost, uncertainty, and timing can cripple a young company right when it has traction. Brolli is positioned as umbrella protection while you build: reduce a category of tail risk cheaply so you can focus on shipping and distribution.

It gives you time to decide without spending a fortune on legal fees. For most early-stage teams, filing early often competes with runway and velocity. A patent is a strategy (and sometimes an enforcement tool), not a default badge. A practical approach is: - Keep shipping and learning what’s truly worth protecting - Reduce catastrophic tail risk cheaply (umbrella coverage) - Revisit a deeper IP strategy once you have traction, budget, and a clear reason to enforce

Sometimes, but it’s often a distraction for early-stage teams. Business process patents can be expensive, slow, and hard to enforce. Many startups end up spending time and money on IP work before they’ve proven distribution or product-market fit. If you’re early-stage, optimize for shipping and derisking. Decide on a deeper IP strategy later when the business can support it.

One real-world example people cite is Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence. Without taking a position on who was "right," it illustrates a founder reality: IP disputes with giants will put you out of business. That's the point of planning for tail risk early: you don't want a legal fight to become the thing that decides whether your product survives.

We’ve integrated x402, first for USDC payments. We will add support for BTC, ETH, and SOL.

All sales are final. See our Terms and Conditions for more information

Wallet address and public on-chain activity. Avoid sharing sensitive information in chat.

Because the NFT is soulbound, wallet rotation is non-trivial. Treat the covered wallet as critical infrastructure and plan custody and key management accordingly.

I can assess your patent risk. Tell me what you're building: • Stablecoin/payment system? • Lending/collateral protocol? • DEX/AMM? • NFT marketplace? • RWA tokenization? • Identity/KYC/privacy features? I'll give you: - Risk score (0-10) - Relevant patent count - Settlement range - ROI analysis (license cost vs. litigation) - Purchase recommendation

Risk scores (0-10) are based on: 1. Patent density in your vertical 2. Enforcement history (trolls vs. legitimate) 3. Settlement data from past cases 4. Overlap with US12095919B2 claims 5. Regulatory scrutiny level Risk Tiers: • 8.0-10.0 = CRITICAL (immediate purchase recommended) • 7.0-7.9 = HIGH (purchase recommended) • 5.0-6.9 = MEDIUM_HIGH (consider license) • 3.0-4.9 = MEDIUM (monitor) • 0-2.9 = LOW (low exposure) Scores ≥7.0 mean you should strongly consider the license.

Blockchain patent settlements typically range: • Payments/Stablecoins: $100K-$500K • Lending/RWA: $100K-$500K • DEX: $50K-$200K • NFT: $25K-$100K This doesn't include: - Legal defense fees ($200K-$1M+) - Lost development time - Delayed fundraising - Investor confidence damage ROI of Brolli license: $99 license vs. $100K-$500K settlement = 1,010x to 5,050x ROI This is why we position it as umbrella protection: reduce catastrophic tail risk cheaply while you build.

US12095919B2 covers: **Dynamic data compliance controls for blockchain systems** Key claims: • Data elements with jurisdictional compliance validation • Access controls with key management • Zero-knowledge proof integration • Dynamic governance based on context • Multi-party authorization workflows In plain terms, it covers: - Tokens with compliance rules (KYC/AML/accreditation) - RWA with geographic restrictions - Privacy features (zkProofs) - Escrow and multi-sig patterns - Conditional access controls If you're building anything with "regulated data" or "compliance controls," you likely overlap with this patent.